The dog who doesn't play with toys, cuddling her squeaky pheasant
I have a few decisions I am considering at the moment.
First, should I keep this blog as it is, change its name, or start a new one – though in theory I don’t need to start a new one as I could just move over to my other blog Chris Crossing Britain. There are several for and against arguments for this one, ie, for changing and against changing:
For:
1. I started this blog to write about all the wonderful things I planned to do with Storm, but obviously that never happened, leading to this page being dormant for several years. That’s actually why I started Chris Crossing Britain in the first place. I could hardly write on this one about walks without Storm; didn’t seem sense.
2. I could change the name (though I haven’t yet had any inspiration as to what to call it) and then it could be ongoing, with whatever dog or dogs we have.
3. It reminds me of Storm and also the sadness of not being able to do the things I had planned with her.
Against:
1. This blog is already up and running and I have continued with it since Sienna joined the family.
2. Yes, it reminds me of Storm, but actually that’s not a bad thing. She taught me a lot – about reactivity, about dog behaviour, about collies in particular.
3. I started it with Storm, but I am still on the ‘path’ which she began, so it could be a continuation of life with my dog, whoever that dog is.
4. Storm was the best dog I ever had – she was also the worst, but that’s another story, which I’ve already told. So keeping the blog as it is would be in her memory as well as showing that life continues even though hers has ended. I’m sure, if she knew about it, she would want me to continue.
So on balance, I’m thinking more of keeping the blog and the current name – what do you think?
Secondly, in an earlier post I said we had decided not to breed
from Sienna due to her age. There are so many risks of having a first litter
from a dog that is (or will be) five when she gives birth – everything from
small litters (which wouldn’t actually be a problem), to more rigid ligaments,
leading to more difficult birth, higher risk of needing a caesarean (which
brings its own risks), or even death of mum, puppies or both. Then if she died
but the puppies survived, how one earth would I cope with a litter that had no mother??
Not sure I’m up to that. It’s not just a matter of feeding them day and night,
but mother dogs also lick their babies to stimulate them to go to the toilet –
and I’m definitely not up for that!
However, while I’m pretty sure we shouldn’t go that route, it seems OH would
actually be prepared to take the risk. Sienna is fit and healthy so he thinks
it won’t be a problem. But then there’s the added question of why do we want to
breed in the first place? She might have done agility in the past, but she’s not
a champion at it and hasn’t competed for a year or two. On the other hand, she
has a lovely temperament and a great ‘off switch’ (rare in border collies) and
makes a great companion for any activity I choose to do – she runs and walks
with me (yet to do a full hike). Is that enough? Or should I reconsider?
Third, Kennel Club registration. With the idea of breeding a dog in mind I decided to register a kennel name with the Kennel Club. Oh, sorry, it’s now the Royal Kennel Club (RKC). Anyway, I have a kennel name. It wasn’t my first choice, or even my second. In fact, I threw in a fourth choice and they decided on that one for some reason. So I am Kiteridge Border Collies. It’s named after the area where I spread Storm’s hair on the moors in Yorkshire. I wanted something related to the red kites I often see up there and something that recalled the features of the moor itself. So my first choice was Stangmoor – it’s an area of moorland to the east of Stang Lane. The RKC obviously didn’t like that one. However, there is an old quarry (now disused) as you walk south east from the road that edges the footpath – well, it’s a field away but it runs along near the edge of the path, so Kiteridge it is. I might write it KiteRidge – you have to have a single word, but there’s no rule about using a capital letter in the middle to separate the two halves of the name.
photo to follow
So, now that I’m pretty sure we are not breeding from Sienna, I have a kennel name that is pretty useless. Which brings me to my next point...
Fourth, having a registered kennel name is no reason to have puppies. If I’m not going to breed Sienna, then why have the name? Good question – unless I buy in a puppy. [Imagine I said that really quickly, so you might miss it J]....


.jpg)






